IN RE HALSEY, No. 11-1435 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. mlniteb ~tate~ <!Court of §ppeaI% for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit IN RE EUGENE HALSEY, IV AND CATHERINE A. GETZ 2011·1435 (Serial No. 101744,522) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ON MOTION ORDER Eugene Halsey, IV, and Catherine A. Getz move for a 21·day extension of time, until January 9, 2012, to file their reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. 2 INREHALSEY FOR THE COURT DEC 1 5 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Gokalp Bayramoglu, Esq. Raymond T. Chen, Esq. s21 FILED u.s. COllRt OF APPEALS FOR THE FEOERAl CIRCUIT DEC 152011 JANHORBAlY ClERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.