ENERGY V BOEING CO, No. 11-1304 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. miniteb ~tate9' (!Court of §ppeaI9' for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit STEVEN CHU, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION), Appellee. --------.--------------------------------------------- -----~------- THE BOEING COMPANY, (Successor-in-Interest of Rockwell International Corporation), Appellant, v. STEVEN CHU, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, Appellee. 2011·1304, -1317 Appeals from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in nos. 337, 338, 339, and 978, Administrative Judge R. Anthony McCann. ENERGY v. BOEING CO 2 ON MOTION ORDER The Boeing Company moves for a 60-day extension of time, until March 9, 2012, to file its reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT JAN 092012 Date cc: Domenique Kirchner, Esq Richard J. Ney, Esq. s21 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbal1 Clerk FILED u.s. COURT OF APPEAlS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JAN 0 9 2012 JAN HORBAlY CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.