FAST MEMORY V INTEL CORP, No. 10-1302 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ FAST MEMORY ERASE, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEL CORPORATION, NUMONYX B.V., NUMONYX, INC., SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS AB, SONY ERICSSON MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA), INC., and APPLE INC., Defendants-Appellees, and MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ 2010-1302 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in No. 10-CV-0481, Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JEFFREY R. BRAGALONE, Shore Chan Bragalone DePumpo, LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiffappellant. With him on the brief were PATRICK J. CONROY and THERESA M. DAWSON. E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellees, Intel Corporation et al. With him on the brief were CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER, CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, STEVEN S. BAIK and STACY B. MARGOLIES, of Menlo Park, California; and MARK S. DAVIES, of Washington, DC. RUSSELL E. LEVINE, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for defendant-appellee, Motorola, Inc. With him on the brief was NYIKA O. STRICKLAND. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief O MALLEY, Circuit Judges). Judge, PROST and AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 8, 2011 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.