PROBERT V CLOROX COMPANY, No. 10-1298 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DAVID D. PROBERT and JACKLYN O. PROBERT, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CLOROX COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ 2010-1298 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 07-CV-0139, Judge Dee V. Benson. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TODD E. ZENGER, Kirton & McConkie, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. DAVID R, WRIGHT, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DAVID R. TODD and CLINTON E. DUKE. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 9, 2010 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.