MICHAEL S SUTTON LTD V NOKIA CORP, No. 10-1218 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MICHAEL S SUTTON LIMITED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NOKIA CORPORATION and NOKIA INC., Defendant-Appellees. ____________________ 2010-1218 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 07-CV-0203, Judge Leonard Davis. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON, Matthews, Lawson & Johnson, PLLC, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were GUY E. MATTHEWS and C. VERNON LAWSON. Of counsel was ANDY TINDEL and GUY G. FISHER, Provost Umphrey Law Firm, of Beaumont, Texas; and JIMMY M. NEGEM, Negem, Bickham & Worthington, of Tyler, Texas. DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were PAUL D. CLEMENT and ADAM M. CONRAD; and ALEXAS D. SKUCAS and MARK H. FRANCIS, of New York, New York. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, Circuit Judges and WHYTE, District Judge * ). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 15, 2010 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation. *

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.