ARKANSAS GAME & FISH COMMISSION V. UNITED STATES , No. 09-5121 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 30, 2011.

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit _____________________ ARKANSAS GAME & FISH COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. _____________________ 2009-5121, 2010-5029 _____________________ Appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims in case no. 05-CV-381, Judge Charles F. Lettow. _____________________ Before NEWMAN, DYK, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER The Supreme Court of the United States, in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States, 568 U.S._ (2012), reversed this court's judgment and remanded for further proceedings. The mandate of this court, issued on August 18, 2011, was recalled by Order of January 17, 2013, and the appeal has been reinstated. The parties are invited to provide supplemental briefing directed to the issues remaining for appellate review, including any new relevant authority. The parties are asked to provide three copies of the originally submitted joint appendix, with any appropriate supplementation. Said briefs shall be due simultaneously from the parties, no later than 45 days after the date of this order, and 2 ARKANSAS GAME & FISH COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES shall be no more than 20 pages in length. Responses may be filed no later than 30 days thereafter and shall be no longer than 10 pages in length. The supplemental briefs shall otherwise comply with the Rules for filing of appellate briefs. The court will determine at a later date whether oral argument is desired. The parties are invited to consider mediation of the issues remaining in the case following the Supreme Court s remand. FOR THE COURT January 29, 2013 Date cc: Julie D. Greathouse, Esq. Robert J. Lundman, Esq. /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.