IN RE ENCAPSULATION TECHNOLOGY, No. 09-1377 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1377 (Reexamination No. 90/007,080) IN RE ENCAPSULATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC Brian D. Smith, Brian D. Smith, P.C., of Denver, Colorado, argued for appellant. Mary L. Kelly, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, and William G. Jenks, Associate Solicitor. Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1377 (Reexamination No. 90/007,080) IN RE ENCAPSULATION TECHNOLOGY, LLC Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. in CASE NO(S). Reexamination No. 90/007,080 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 23, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.