GED INTEGRATED V DUROTECH INTL, No. 09-1273 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1273, -1286 GED INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC. and NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY (doing business as Ashland Products, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DUROTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. Thomas H. Shunk, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Stephen J. Schultz and George L. Pinchak, Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell & Tummino LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio. Timothy J. Monahan, Monahan & Moses, LLC, of Greenville, South Carolina, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were Ray L. Weber and Laura J. Gentilcore, Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber, LPA, of Akron, Ohio. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Judge John R. Adams NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1273,-1286 GED INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC. and NEWELL OPERATING COMPANY (doing business as Ashland Products, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DUROTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in CASE NO(S). 5:06-CV-1327. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges ) AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED December 14, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.