CORNISH V KAPPOS, No. 09-1093 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1093 CORNELL D.M. JUDGE CORNISH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN J. DOLL, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, HARRY I. MOATZ, Director of Office of Enrollment and Discipline, and WILLIAM J. GRIFFIN, Attorney, Office of Enrollment and Discipline, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in case no. 07CV-1719, Judge Richard W. Roberts. Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. ORDER Cornell D.M. Judge Cornish submits a brief in reply to the court's April 21, 2009 order. The court considers whether Cornish's submission should be treated as his reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) Cornish's May 5, 2009 submission is treated as a reply brief. (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel assigned to decide this case. FOR THE COURT MAY 18 2009 Date cc: Cornell D.M. Cornish Raymond T. Chen, Esq. /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk ustilaartor MAY 1 8 2009 s17 CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.