BALLY GAMING V IGT, No. 09-1072 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Note: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1072 BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Technologies), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IGT, Defendant/Third Party PlaintiffAppellee. v. SIERRA DESIGN GROUP, Third Party Defendant. Amy H. Candido, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were Charles K. Verhoeven, Eric E. Wall, and Todd Kennedy. Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer Brown LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant/third party plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Nathaniel Hamstra and Andrea C. Hutchison. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada Senior Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr. NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1072 BALLY GAMING, INC. (doing business as Bally Technologies), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IGT, Defendant/Third Party PlaintiffAppellee, v. SIERRA DESIGN GROUP, Third Party Defendant. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in CASE NO(S). 3:06-CV-0483 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (NEWMAN, BRYSON and LINN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED October 22, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.