PEER COMMUNICATIONS V SKYPE TECH, No. 09-1069 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1069 PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC., and EBAY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Michael T. Cooke, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, of Fort Worth, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jonathan T. Suder. Of counsel on the brief were Edward R. Nelson, III, and Steven W. Hartsell, Nelson Bumgardner Casto, P.C., of Fort Worth, Texas. Of counsel was Stephen D. Susman, Susman Godfrey L.L.P., of Houston, Texas. Andrei Iancu, Irell & Manella LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Morgan Chu, Alan J. Heinrich and Benjamin T. Wang. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Judge Leonard Davis NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1069 PEER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA, SKYPE, INC., and EBAY, INC., Defendants-Appellees. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in CASE NO(S). 6:06-CV-370. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, RADER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges ) AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED October 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.