1ST TECHNOLOGY V RATIONAL ENTERPRIS, No. 08-1132 (Fed. Cir. 2008)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1132 1ST TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTDA. and RATIONAL POKER SCHOOL LIMITED, Defendants, and BODOG ENTERTAINMENT S.A., BODOG.NET, and BODOG.COM, Defendants-Appellants. Robert P. Greenspoon, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was William W. Flachsbart. Of counsel on the brief were L. Kristopher Rath, Kevin M. Sutehall, and Michael K. Wall, Hutchison & Steffen, LLC, of Las Vegas, Nevada. Victor de Gyarfas, Foley & Lardner LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were James D. Nguyen, of Los Angeles, California, and George E. Quillin, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Nevada Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1132 1ST TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RATIONAL ENTERPRISES LTDA. and RATIONAL POKER SCHOOL LIMITED, Defendants, and BODOG ENTERTAINMENT S.A., BODOG.NET, and BODOG.COM, Defendants-Appellants. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in CASE NO(S). 2:06-CV-1110. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MAYER, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.) AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: October 8, 2008 / s / Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.