RICOH V PITNEY BOWES, No. 07-1479 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1479 RICOH CORPORATION and RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PITNEY BOWES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Lawrence B. Friedman, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were David H. Herrington, Roger A. Cooper, and Kathleya Chotiros. Jan M. Conlin, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Munir R. Meghjee, and Katie Crosby Lehmann. Of counsel were Kimberly G. Miller and Stacie E. Oberts. Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr. NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-1479 RICOH CORPORATION and RICOH COMPANY, LTD, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PITNEY BOWES, INC, Defendant-Appellee. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey In CASE NO(S). 02-CV-5639 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, DYK, Circuit Judges, and WALKER, Chief District Judge*). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATE:__September 8, 2008__ _/s/ Jan Horbaly___________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk * Honorable Vaughn R. Walker, Chief District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
