CAPITAL BRIDGE V IVL TECHNOLOGIES, No. 06-1637 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1637 CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and MEMCORP, INC. and CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants. Brian L. Wamsley, Goodwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was Anthony H. Handal, Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels, LLP, of New York, New York. Daniel P. Burke, Daniel P. Burke & Associates, PLLC, of Hauppauge, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Georgia Damoulakis. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth M. Karas NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-1637 CAPITAL BRIDGE CO., LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IVL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Defendant-Appellee, and MEMCORP, INC. And CRAIG ELECTRONICS, INC., Defendants. Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in CASE NO(S). 04-CV-4002 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL, Circuit Judge, and BUCKLO i , District Judge). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT DATED: August 10, 2007 i /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.