1975 D.C. Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 501 - 528 of 528

U. S. v. Blocker
Date: January 15, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
Kane v. Greene
Date: January 15, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 537
U. S. v. Kerr
Date: January 15, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
U. S. v. Floyd
Date: January 15, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
Boston Community Media Committee, Minority Caucus, Appellant, v. Federal Communications Commission, Appellee
Date: January 15, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 516
United States of America v. Arthur B. Knight, Appellant.united States of America v. Robert L. Johnson, Appellant.united States of America v. Haywood T. Kirkland, Appellant
Date: January 14, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 354
Public Service Commission for the State of New York, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent.public Service Commission of the State of New York, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent
Date: January 14, 1975
 Citation: 511 F.2d 338
U. S. v. Smith
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,tenneco Oil Company, et al., Intervenors.public Service Commission of the State of New York, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,exxon Corporation et al., Intervenors.american Public Gas Association, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,public Service Commission of the State of New York et al.,intervenors
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 510 F.2d 656
W. Peter Carey et al., Appellants, v. J. J. O'donnell (president of Air Line Pilots Association), et al.george S. Chaudoin et al., Appellants, v. Air Line Pilots Association et al
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 506 F.2d 107
Northeast Master Executive Council, Petitioner, v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Respondent, Air Line Pilotsassociation International et al., Intervenors.w. Peter Carey et al., Appellants, v. J. J. O'donnell (president of Air Line Pilots Association) et al.george S. Chaudoin et al., Appellants, v. Air Line Pilots Association et al
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 506 F.2d 97
U. S. v. Bias
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
U. S. v. Stokes
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
Chapa v. Volkswagen of America, Inc
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 537
Stein v. Biocoustics, Inc
Date: January 13, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
U. S. v. Mavins
Date: January 10, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
United States Steel Corporation et al., Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,central Illinois Public Service Co. et al., Intervenors
Date: January 10, 1975
 Citation: 510 F.2d 689
Smith v. Schlesinger
Date: January 9, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 538
Haywood J. Bullock et al., Appellants, v. L. Quincy Mumford, Individually and As the Librarian Ofcongress, et al., Appellees
Date: January 8, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 384
Helen B. Elliott, Individually and As Administratrix of Theestate of Darlene Julie Elliott, Appellant, v. Michael James, Inc., T/a Gentlemen Ii, et al
Date: January 7, 1975
 Citation: 507 F.2d 1179
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. Perper
Date: January 6, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 537
Carl Norman Quinn, Petitioner, v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States Ofamerica, Respondents
Date: January 6, 1975
 Citation: 510 F.2d 743
Mccoy v. Herring
Date: January 6, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 537
Colonial Times, Inc., D.b.a. the Daily Rag, Petitioner, v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District Judge, Respondent
Date: January 3, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 517
Sierra Club et al., Appellants, v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the United Statesdepartment of the Interior, et al
Date: January 3, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 533
Margulies, in Re
Date: January 3, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 537
United States of America v. Conrad S. Dancy, Appellant (two Cases)
Date: January 2, 1975
 Citation: 510 F.2d 779
United States of America v. Charles E. Wiggins, Appellant
Date: January 2, 1975
 Citation: 509 F.2d 454

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.