PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO V. FELICIA PONCE, No. 21-55877 (9th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. FELICIA PONCE, Warden, FILED OCT 17 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 21-55877 D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00072-ODW-JDE MEMORANDUM * Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 10, 2023** Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Appellee’s motion to lift the stay in these proceedings is granted. The stay of this action, entered on November 22, 2022, is lifted. Federal prisoner Phillip Camillo-Amisano appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). ** jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Pinson v. Carvajal, 69 F.4th 1059, 1063 (9th Cir. 2023), we affirm. Camillo-Amisano contends that the district court erred by concluding that his claim regarding the conditions of his confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic was not cognizable in a § 2241 habeas petition. Contrary to CamilloAmisano’s contention, the fact that he was seeking immediate release is insufficient to invoke habeas jurisdiction. See id. at 1072-73 (“[A] successful claim sounding in habeas necessarily results in release, but a claim seeking release does not necessarily sound in habeas.”). Rather, Camillo-Amisano needed to show that his detention is without legal authorization. See id. at 1070. Because he failed to do so, the district court properly dismissed his petition. See id. at 1073-75 (holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction over a § 2241 petition seeking release on the basis of prison conditions arising from the COVID-19 pandemic). The record demonstrates that the Department of Justice received and denied Camillo-Amisano’s request to be transferred to Canada, contradicting his contention that prison officials intentionally interfered with his transfer request by taking no action on it. AFFIRMED. 2 21-55877
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
