OLSON V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, No. 21-55757 (9th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on March 17, 2023.
Download PDF
FILED FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 18 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LYDIA OLSON; MIGUEL PEREZ; POSTMATES, INC., (Successor Postmates LLC); UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 21-55757 D.C. No. 2:19-cv-10956-DMG-RAO Central District of California, Los Angeles v. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ROB BONTA, in his capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees. MURGUIA, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
