LISA VARGAS V. NIKOLIS PEREZ, No. 21-55054 (9th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 30 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LISA VARGAS, No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 21-55054 D.C. No. 2:19-cv-03279-PSG-AS v. NIKOLIS PEREZ, an individual; JONATHAN ROJAS, an individual, MEMORANDUM* Defendants-Appellants, and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a governmental entity; DOES, 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 18, 2021** Pasadena, California * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: LINN,*** BYBEE, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. When an interlocutory appeal challenges the district court’s determination that there is sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to material fact, we lack appellate jurisdiction. Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 2021). Because appellants’ appeal amounts to a challenge to the district court’s decision on the facts, we lack jurisdiction. DISMISSED. *** The Honorable Richard Linn, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.