MATTHEW BRACH V. GAVIN NEWSOM, No. 20-56291 (9th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on July 23, 2021.
Download PDF
FILED FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW BRACH, an individual; JESSE PETRILLA, an individual; LACEE BEAULIEU, an individual; ERICA SEPHTON, an individual; KENNETH FLEMING, an individual; JOHN ZIEGLER, an individual; ALISON WALSH, an individual; ROGER HACKETT, an individual; CHRISTINE RUIZ, an individual; Z. R., a minor; ADE ONIBOKUN, an individual; BRIAN HAWKINS, an individual; TIFFANY MITROWKE, an individual; MARIANNA BEMA; ASHLEY RAMIREZ, an individual, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as the Governor of California; ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California; TOMAS ARAGON, in his official capacity as the State Public Health Officer and Department of Public Health Director; TONY THURMOND, in his official capacity as State Superintendent of Public Instruction and Director of Education, Defendants-Appellees. No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 20-56291 D.C. No. 2:20-cv-06472-SVW-AFM Central District of California, Los Angeles ORDER . MURGUIA, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
