CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE US V. ROB BONTA, No. 20-15291 (9th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 15, 2021.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE; NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION; CALIFORNIA RETAILERS ASSOCIATION; NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITY COMPANIES; HOME CARE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA; CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION FOR HEALTH SERVICES AT HOME, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of California; LILIA GARCIABROWER, in her official capacity as the Labor Commissioner of the State of California; JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency; KEVIN No. 20-15291 D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02456-KJM-DB ORDER 2 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V. BONTA RICHARD KISH, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing of the State of California, Defendants-Appellants. Filed August 22, 2022 Before: Carlos F. Lucero,* William A. Fletcher, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges. Order ORDER A majority of the panel has voted sua sponte to grant panel rehearing. Judge Fletcher and Judge Ikuta voted in favor of rehearing, and Judge Lucero voted against rehearing. The opinion and dissent filed on September 15, 2021, Dkt. 38, are withdrawn, and the case is resubmitted. The petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 41, is DENIED as moot. * The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
