IN RE: PRAVEEN KHURANA V. STATE OF IDAHO, No. 19-60069 (9th Cir. 2022)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED DEC 14 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: PRAVEEN KEVIN KHURANA, Debtor, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-60069 BAP No. 18-1196 ------------------------------ MEMORANDUM* PRAVEEN KEVIN KHURANA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WELFARE, STATE OF IDAHO, Appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Brand, Gan, and Faris, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted December 8, 2022** Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. Praveen Kevin Khurana appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders in connection with a state court fraudulent transfer action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We affirm. In his opening brief, Khurana failed to address how the BAP or bankruptcy court erred and has therefore waived his challenge to the BAP’s judgment or the bankruptcy court’s orders. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that “we will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (noting that “[w]e will not manufacture arguments for an appellant . . . .”). AFFIRMED. 2 19-60069
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
