SAM CONSIGLIO, JR. V. PAMELA AHLIN, No. 19-17496 (9th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FEB 22 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SAM CONSIGLIO, Jr., U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 19-17496 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:16-cv-01268-AWI-SAB v. MEMORANDUM* PAMELA AHLIN; BRANDON PRICE, Defendants-Appellees, and EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding Submitted February 17, 2021** Before: FERNANDEZ, BYBEE, and BADE, Circuit Judges. California civil detainee Sam Consiglio, Jr. appeals pro se from the district * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. Consiglio failed to include any argument in his opening brief regarding the district court’s dismissal of his action as untimely under the applicable statute of limitations, and thus has waived any challenge to that issue. See McKay v. Ingleson, 558 F.3d 888, 891 n.5 (9th Cir. 2009) (arguments not raised in an appellant’s opening brief are waived). AFFIRMED. 2 19-17496

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.