JULIO CORDOVA-MARTINEZ V. WILLIAM BARR, No. 18-73347 (9th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED APR 17 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JULIO CORDOVA-MARTINEZ, AKA Marvin Campos, AKA Juan SanchezGomez, Petitioner, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 18-73347 Agency No. A206-677-042 MEMORANDUM* v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted April 7, 2020** Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Julio Cordova-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review. Cordova-Martinez does not raise, and therefore waives, any challenge to the agency’s removability determination and the denial of cancellation of removal. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived). We lack jurisdiction to review Cordova-Martinez’s due process claims. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (finding no jurisdiction to review due process claims based on correctable procedural errors that were not raised to the agency). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. 2 18-73347
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
