DANIEL LAK V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, No. 18-56613 (9th Cir. 2020)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED JUN 5 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL KRISTOF LAK, Esquire, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 18-56613 D.C. No. 8:18-cv-00160-PSG-KK MEMORANDUM* STATE OF CALIFORNIA; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 2, 2020** Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges. Daniel Kristof Lak appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on the basis that the complaint failed to comply with the notice pleading requirements of Federal Rule * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). of Civil Procedure 8. Pickern v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., 457 F.3d 963, 968 (9th Cir. 2006). We affirm. The district court properly dismissed Lak’s action because Lak failed to give each “defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted, alteration in original); McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 1996) (complaint does not comply with Rule 8 if “one cannot determine from the complaint who is being sued, for what relief, and on what theory”). Defendant State of California’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied as moot. AFFIRMED. 2 18-56613

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.