United States v. Magdirila, No. 18-50430 (9th Cir. 2020)
Annotate this Case
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress contraband found in the vehicle defendant was driving. The district court held that the evidence was discovered during a valid inventory search.
As a preliminary matter, the panel held that defendant has not waived arguments challenging the district court's denial of his motion to suppress. On the merits of the motion, the panel affirmed and held that the officers' failure to precisely comply with police department towing policy by failing to completely fill out the CHP 180 form did not render the search invalid. The panel stated that this case was considerably clearer than United States v. Garay, 938 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2019), which held that the failure to complete the form under the circumstances was not a material deviation from policy and did not make the search invalid. In this case, by creating a list of recovered items and incorporating it into a CHP 180 form, an officer complied substantially with the policy's direction to inventory the property in an impounded vehicle. Furthermore, given the early stage at which an officer decided to impound the vehicle, it is a reasonable view of the evidence that the officer's intent at the time the vehicle was impounded was administrative rather than investigatory.
Finally, the panel vacated three conditions of supervised release where the government conceded error or made no argument. The panel remanded for revision, as well as vacated and remanded the notification-of-risk condition.
Court Description: Criminal Law. The panel affirmed the district court’s denial of a criminal defendant’s motion to suppress contraband found during an inventory search of a vehicle he was driving, vacated challenged conditions of supervised release, and remanded. The panel held that the defendant preserved both of his central arguments on appeal challenging the denial of the motion to suppress. The panel held that the officers’ failure to precisely comply with Inglewood Police Department towing policy when they failed to completely fill out an inventory form did not render the search invalid. The panel explained that this case is considerably clearer than United States v. Garay, 938 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2019), which held that the failure to complete the form under the circumstances was not a material deviation from policy and did not make the search invalid. The panel wrote that by creating a list of recovered items and incorporating it into a CHP 180 form, an officer complied substantially with the policy’s direction to inventory the property in an impounded vehicle. The panel also held that, given the early stage at which an officer decided to impound the vehicle, it is a reasonable view of the evidence that the officer’s intent at the time the vehicle was impounded was administrative rather than investigatory. UNITED STATES V. MAGDIRILA 3 The panel vacated three conditions of supervised release as to which the government conceded error or made no argument, and remanded for revision. The panel vacated a disputed notification-of-risk condition, and remanded for the district court to craft a condition that accords with the defendant’s criminal history. Concurring, Judge Berzon wrote separately to note that she believes Garay was wrongly decided.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.