Cutts v. Richland Holdings, Inc., No. 18-15377 (9th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this CaseThe Ninth Circuit certified the following question to the Nevada Supreme Court: Is a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim a compulsory counterclaim in an action to collect the underlying debt under Rule 13 of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure?
Court Description: Certification of Question to State Supreme Court. The panel certified the following question to the Nevada Supreme Court: Is a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act claim a compulsory counterclaim in an action to collect the underlying debt under Rule 13 of the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure? The panel addressed other issues in a concurrently filed memorandum disposition. It stayed the appeal of the district court’s dismissal of FDCPA claims pending the Nevada Supreme Court’s resolution of the certified question. CUTTS V. RICHLAND HOLDINGS, INC. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.