United States v. Campbell, No. 17-50140 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case18 U.S.C. 3583(i), which extends the power to revoke a term of supervised release even after the term has expired, does not empower a district court to base a revocation upon violations which (1) were not alleged prior to the expiration period and (2) are not otherwise factually related to a matter raised in a signed warrant or summons issued before expiration. In this case, the Ninth Circuit vacated the district court's order revoking supervised release and remanded for further proceedings. The panel held that the district court erred in adjudicating the perjury allegations because they were submitted by the probation officer after defendant's term of supervision had expired.
Court Description: Criminal Law. Vacating the district court’s order revoking supervised release and remanding for further proceedings, the panel held that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(i), which extends the power to revoke a term of supervised release even after the term has expired, does not empower a district court to base a revocation upon violations which (1) were not alleged prior to the expiration period and (2) are not otherwise factually related to a matter raised in a signed warrant or summons issued before expiration.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.