LL Liquor, Inc. v. Montana, No. 17-35405 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for the state in an action brought by LL Liquor, claiming that Montana's Senate Bill 193 impaired the company's contract to purchase liquor with the Montana Department of Revenue, in violation of the Contracts Clause. Montana's Senate Bill 193 restructured the formula for calculating the rate at which state-approved agency franchise stores could purchase liquor from the state.
The panel held that Montana's Senate Bill 193, which applied a uniform commission structure to all franchise stores in the state, did not give rise to a Contracts Clause claim by LL Liquor against the state. In this case, the state did not impair its contractual obligation within the meaning of the Contracts Clause because it did not eliminate LL Liquor's remedy for breach of its contract with the state.
Court Description: Civil Rights. The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the State of Montana with respect to LL Liquor’s claim that that Montana’s Senate Bill 193, which restructured the formula for calculating the rate at which state-approved agency franchise stores could purchase liquor from the state, impaired LL Liquor’s contract to purchase liquor with the Montana Department of Revenue, in violation of the Contracts Clause. The panel held Montana did not impair its contractual obligation to LL Liquor within the meaning of the Contracts Clause because it did not eliminate LL Liquor’s remedy for breach of its contract with the state. The panel addressed LL Liquor’s breach-of-contract claim in a memorandum disposition filed concurrently with the panel’s opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.