United States v. Schram, No. 17-30055 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseA person who is prohibited from entering a residence by a court's no-contact order lacks a legitimate expectation of privacy in that residence and may not challenge its search on Fourth Amendment grounds. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress, holding that defendant could not challenge the search of a residence that a no-contact court order barred him from entering. The panel reversed defendant's conviction in a concurrently filed memorandum disposition.
Court Description: Criminal Law Affirming the district court’s denial of a suppression motion, the panel held that a person who is prohibited from entering a residence by a court’s no-contact order lacks a legitimate expectation of privacy in that residence and may not challenge its search on Fourth Amendment grounds. The panel reversed the defendant’s conviction in a concurrently filed memorandum disposition.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.