SERGIO RAMIREZ V. TRANS UNION LLC, No. 17-17244 (9th Cir. 2021)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 27, 2020.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SERGIO L. RAMIREZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 17-17244 v. D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00632-JSC TRANS UNION LLC, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed August 23, 2021 Before: M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. Order 2 RAMIREZ V. TRANS UNION COUNSEL Paul D. Clement, Erin E. Murphy, Robert M. Bernstein, and Matthew D. Rowen, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, D.C.; Julia B. Strickland, Stephen J. Newman, Christine E. Ellice, and Jason Yoo, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Los Angeles, California; for Defendant-Appellant. James A. Francis, John Soumilas, David A. Searles, and Lauren KW Brennan, Francis & Mailman P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Andrew J. Ogilvie and Carol McLean Brewer, San Francisco, California; for PlaintiffAppellee. Andrew J. Pincus, Archis A. Parasharami, and Daniel E. Jones, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, D.C.; Steven P. Lehotsky and Warren Postman, U.S. Chamber Litigation Center Inc., Washington, D.C.; for Amicus Curiae Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America. ORDER The United States Supreme Court reversed the judgment in this case and remanded the case to this court for further proceedings. See TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190, 2214 (2021). We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision. The copy of this order shall act as and for the mandate of this court. REMANDED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
