RODRIGO RIOS-GONZALEZ V. WILLIAM BARR, No. 16-72266 (9th Cir. 2019)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FEB 21 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RODRIGO RIOS-GONZALEZ, Petitioner, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 16-72266 Agency No. A200-964-064 v. MEMORANDUM* WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 19, 2019** Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. Rodrigo Rios-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Cabantac * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Holder, 736 F.3d 787, 792 (9th Cir. 2013). We deny the petition for review. The agency correctly determined Rios-Gonzalez’s conviction for possession for sale of a controlled substance, specifically cocaine salt, under California Health and Safety Code (“CHSC”) § 11351 is an aggravated felony. See Lopez v. Sessions, 901 F.3d 1071, 1075 (9th Cir. 2018) (using the modified categorical approach, court determined that a record of conviction reflecting a plea to CHSC § 11351 involving cocaine salt showed the alien had been convicted of an aggravated felony). As a result, he is ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C). Rios-Gonzalez’s contention that he would be eligible for Federal First Offender Act status is not persuasive, where he was convicted for possession for sale of a controlled substance, and where the record does not indicate his petition to have his conviction dismissed was ultimately granted. See Lopez, 901 F.3d at 1075-76 (Federal First Offender exception did not apply to conviction under CHSC § 11351). We are also not persuaded by Rios-Gonzalez’s contention that CHSC § 11351 punishes conduct not publishable by the federal equivalent. Rios-Gonzalez’s contention that the IJ erred in denying relief without securing the record of conviction is not supported, where the record of conviction is in the administrative record. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 2 16-72266
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
