ENRIQUE GREENBERG V. U.S. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, No. 16-60085 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED AUG 27 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, No. 16-60085 Debtor. ______________________________ BAP No. 16-1350 ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE Appellee. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Lafferty and Kurtz, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding In re: ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, No. 16-60089 Debtor. ______________________________ BAP No. 16-1212 ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; et al. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Appellees. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Faris and Lafferty, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding In re: ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, No. 17-60029 Debtor. BAP No. 16-1212 MEMORANDUM* ENRIQUE V. GREENBERG, Appellant, v. U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; et al. Appellees. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Kurtz, Brand, and Lafferty, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted August 15, 2018** Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2 16-60085, 16-60089, 17-60029 Enrique V. Greenberg appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) interlocutory orders denying Greenberg’s motions for a stay pending appeal and an order denying Greenberg’s motion for reconsideration of the BAP’s order dismissing his appeal as moot. We dismiss these appeals as moot. After Greenberg filed the instant appeals, this court dismissed his appeal from a judgment of the BAP affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Greenberg’s chapter 11 bankruptcy case as filed in bad faith. See Greenberg v. United States Trustee, No. 17-60078 (9th Cir. Feb. 14, 2018). Accordingly, these appeals are rendered moot because this court is unable to grant the requested relief. See Vegas Diamond Props., LLC v. FDIC, 669 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir. 2012) (“An appeal is moot if no present controversy exists as to which an appellate court can grant effective relief.”). DISMISSED. 3 16-60085, 16-60089, 17-60029
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
