LAURA BLANKENSHIP V. TODD MCDEVITT, No. 16-35891 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED MAY 24 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LAURA BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative and a Legal Heir of the Estate of Alexander L. Mandarino; LAMONT MANDARINO, as Co-Personal Representative and a Legal Heir of the Estate of Alexander L. Mandarino, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 16-35891 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00281-EJL-REB MEMORANDUM* Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TODD MCDEVITT, individually; ADAM DURFLINGER, individually; SHOSHONE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 15, 2018 Seattle, Washington Before: BERZON, THACKER,** and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Stephanie Dawn Thacker, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting by designation. Laura Blankenship and Lamont Mandarino (“Appellants”), as personal representatives and legal heirs to the estate of Alexander L. Mandarino (“Mandarino”), appeal the district court’s award of summary judgment to Todd McDevitt, Adam Durflinger, and the Shoshone County Sheriff’s Office on Appellants’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive force claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1. The district court did not err in determining that Mandarino’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from excessive force was not violated. We conclude that the use of deadly force was objectively reasonable for the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum Decision and Order.1 2. The district court also did not err in granting summary judgment to McDevitt and Durflinger based on qualified immunity. Because no constitutional violation occurred, the officers are entitled to qualified immunity. See Aguilera v. Baca, 510 F.3d 1161, 1167 (9th Cir. 2007) (“If we determine . . . that no constitutional violation occurred, the qualified immunity inquiry is at an end.”). 3. Finally, the district court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Sheriff’s Office. Because no constitutional violation occurred, the Sheriff’s Office “cannot be held liable and whether ‘the departmental regulations might have 1 On appeal, Appellants conceded that the deadly force used in the last 15 seconds of the encounter was objectively reasonable. But even in the absence of that concession, the claim fails for the reasons stated by the district court. 2 authorized the use of constitutionally excessive force is quite beside the point.’” Long v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 511 F.3d 901, 907 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting City of Los Angeles v. Heller, 475 U.S. 796, 799 (1986)). AFFIRMED. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
