Airline Service Providers Assoc. v. Los Angeles World Airports, No. 15-55571 (9th Cir. 2017)
Annotate this CaseThe City of Los Angeles, which operates Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), can require businesses at the airport to accept certain contractual conditions aimed at preventing service disruptions. The City licenses service providers using a contract that imposes certain conditions. One such condition, section 25, requires service providers to enter a "labor peace agreement" with any employee organization that requests one. The Ninth Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part the dismissal of an action by two air transport trade associations. The panel held that ASPA meet all the requirements for associational standing; the City was acting as a market participant and not a regulator when it adopted section 25; and, because nothing in the National Labor Relations Act, the Railway Labor Act, and the Airline Deregulation Act shows that Congress meant to preempt states or local governments from actions taken while participating in markets in a non-regulatory capacity, section 25 was not preempted by those federal statutes. The court also held that the district court erred by denying leave to amend the complaint for plaintiffs to identify large spillover effects that might substantiate their claim that section 25 acted as a regulation.
Court Description: Labor Law. The panel affirmed in part and vacated in part the district court’s dismissal of an action brought by two air transport trade associations asserting that the City of Los Angeles, in its capacity as proprietor of Los Angeles International Airport, may not require businesses at the airport to accept a contractual condition concerning labor agreements. Airlines that operate out of LAX hire third-party businesses to refuel and load planes, take baggage and tickets, help disabled passengers, and provide similar services. The City licenses those service providers using a contract that imposes certain conditions. One such condition, section 25, requires service providers to enter a “labor peace agreement” with any employee organization that requests one. The trade associations argued that, because the City operates LAX, the contractual conditions in LAX’s standard licensing agreement are effectively municipal regulations. The associations contended that section 25, as one such “regulation,” was preempted by the National Labor Relations Act, the Railway Labor Act, and the Airline Deregulation Act.
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on October 16, 2017.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.