In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation, No. 15-15858 (9th Cir. 2017)Annotate this Case
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's order approving the cy pres-only settlement arising from class action claims that Google violated users' privacy by disclosing their Internet search terms to owners of third-party websites. The panel held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in approving a cy pres- only settlement where the settlement funds were non-distributable; the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the superiority requirement was met because the litigation would otherwise be economically infeasible; the district court did not abuse its discretion in approving the six cy pres recipients; the district court appropriately found that the cy pres distribution addressed the objectives of the Stored Communications Act and furthered the interests of the class members; a prior relationship or connection between the cy pres recipient and the parties or their counsel, without more, was not an absolute disqualifier; and the district court did not abuse its discretion by approving $2.125 million in fees and $21,643.16 in costs.
- In re GOOGLE REFERRER HEADER PRIVACY LITIGATION, No. 5:2010cv04809 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)
- Frank v. Gaos, No. 17-961 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2019)