ALEC MARSH V. J. ALEXANDER'S LLC, No. 15-15791 (9th Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on September 6, 2017.

Download PDF

FILED FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 16 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEC MARSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. ALEXANDER'S LLC, No. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 15-15791 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01038-SMM District of Arizona, Phoenix ORDER Defendant-Appellee. CRYSTAL SHEEHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROMULUS INCORPORATED, DBA International House of Pancakes, Defendant-Appellee. No. 15-15794 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00464-SMM SILVIA ALARCON, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 15-16561 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00465-SMM v. ARRIBA ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED, DBA Arriba Mexican Grill, Defendant-Appellee. SAROSHA HOGAN; NICHOLAS JACKSON; SKYLAR VAZQUEZ; THOMAS ARMSTRONG; PHILIP TODD; MARIA HURKMANS, No. 15-16659 D.C. Nos. Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. 2:14-cv-00051-SMM 2:14-cv-00766-SMM 2:14-cv-00768-SMM 2:14-cv-00769-SMM 2:14-cv-01243-SMM 2:14-cv-01244-SMM AMERICAN MULTI-CINEMA, INC., DBA AMC Theatres Esplanade 14, Defendant-Appellee. NATHAN LLANOS, an individual, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 16-15003 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00261-SMM v. P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC., Defendant-Appellee. 2 KRISTEN ROMERO, an individual, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 16-15004 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00262-SMM v. P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ANDREW FIELDS, an individual, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 16-15005 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00263-SMM v. P.F. CHANG'S CHINA BISTRO, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ALTO WILLIAMS, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 16-15118 D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01467-SMM v. AMERICAN BLUE RIBBON HOLDINGS LLC, Defendant-Appellee. 3 STEPHANIE R. FAUSNACHT, No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 16-16033 D.C. No. 2:15-cv-01561-SMM v. LION'S DEN MANAGEMENT, LLC, DBA Denny's, Defendant-Appellee. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases. 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.