LACEY SIVAK V. TIMOTHY WILSON, No. 14-35877 (9th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 25 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LACEY MARK SIVAK, No. 14-35877 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:93-cv-00081-EJL v. MEMORANDUM* TIMOTHY D. WILSON; et al., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 15, 2016** Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Lacey Mark Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his request to file various actions. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990). * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in revising a prior pre-filing order to conform to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and in applying the revised order to Sivak’s proposed actions. AFFIRMED. 2 14-35877

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.