Shirrod v. OWCP, No. 13-70613 (9th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CasePetitioner was awarded benefits under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. 928(a), for injuries he sustained while working for PacificRim. On appeal, petitioner challenged the Board's decision affirming an ALJ's award of attorney's fees under the Act. The court concluded that the proxy market rate relied upon by the ALJ does not adequately reflect market rates for Portland, Oregon, the relevant community, because it is based entirely on data not tailored to Portland, even though reliable information about attorney billing rates in Portland was readily available. Therefore, the court held that the Board erred in affirming the attorney’s-fee award based on a proxy market rate not tailored to the “relevant community.” Accordingly, the court granted the petition for review, vacated the judgment, and remanded for further proceedings.
Court Description: Longshore Act / Attorney’s Fees. The panel granted a petition for review and vacated the Benefit Review Board’s decision affirming an administrative law judge’s award of attorney’s fees under the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, and remanded for further proceedings. During workers’-compensation proceedings, an ALJ awarded petitioner attorney’s fees for work performed before the ALJ, as authorized under a fee-shifting provision of the Longshore Act, 33 U.S.C. § 928(a). The panel held that the Benefits Review Board erred in affirming the ALJ’s award of attorney’s fees for work performed by petitioner’s attorney because the proxy market rate on which the award depended did not adequately represent market rates in the “relevant community,” here, Portland, Oregon. SHIRROD V. OWCP 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.