CHARITY SEYMOUR V. BANK OF AMERICA, No. 13-60080 (9th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MAY 04 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS In re: CHARITY M. SEYMOUR, Debtor, No. 13-60080 BAP No. 11-1669 CHARITY M. SEYMOUR, MEMORANDUM* Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA; STEPHEN CHARLES FERLMANN, Attorney, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellees. Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Markell, Dunn, and Jury, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding Submitted April 22, 2015** Before: GOODWIN, BYBEE, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Charity M. Seymour appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s judgment dismissing Seymour’s adversary proceeding against her creditor Bank of America. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian), 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm. The bankruptcy court properly dismissed Seymour’s adversary proceeding because she lacked standing to prosecute the claims, which arose pre-petition and were accordingly property of the estate. See Estate of Spirtos v. One San Bernardino Cnty. Superior Court Case Numbered SPR 02211, 443 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006) (bankruptcy code endows bankruptcy trustee with exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate); Cusano v. Klein, 264 F.3d 936, 945-47 (9th Cir. 2001) (unscheduled asset continues to belong to estate and does not revert back to debtor when case closes). The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Seymour leave to amend because any amendment would have been futile. See Ditto v. McCurdy, 510 F.3d 1070, 1078-79 (9th Cir. 2007) (stating standard of review); see also Brawders v. County of Ventura (In re Brawders), 503 F.3d 856, 867-68 (9th 2 13-60080 Cir. 2007) (absent some action by the representative of the bankruptcy estate, liens ordinarily pass through bankruptcy unaffected). AFFIRMED. 3 13-60080

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.