STEPHEN MORRIS V. ERNST & YOUNG, No. 13-16599 (9th Cir. 2018)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on August 22, 2016.
Download PDF
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT STEPHEN MORRIS; KELLY MCDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 13-16599 D.C. No. 5:12-cv-04964-RMW v. OPINION ERNST & YOUNG, LLP; ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP, Defendants-Appellees. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed July 9, 2018 Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Sandra S. Ikuta and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion 2 MORRIS V. ERNST & YOUNG OPINION PER CURIAM: In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated May 21, 2018, the opinion of this Court dated August 22, 2016, 834 F.3d 975 is VACATED and judgment is entered AFFIRMING the district court’s grant of DefendantAppellees’ motion to compel arbitration. AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
