United States v. Morales-Isabarra, No. 13-10005 (9th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant challenged the district court's jurisdiction to revoke a term of supervised release after the term had expired. The court concluded that the period from the date defendant's supervised release term ended in May 2009, until the date of his final revocation hearing and sentencing was "reasonably necessary" for the adjudication of the violation of his 2003 supervised release conditions. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Court Description: Criminal Law. Affirming the district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss in which the defendant asserted that the district court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his supervised release, the panel held that the period from the date the defendant’s supervised release term ended in May 2009, until the date of his final revocation hearing and sentencing, was “reasonably necessary” for the adjudication of his 2003 supervised release violation.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.