United States v. Charles, No. 12-50150 (9th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendant plead guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession with intent to distribute at least 50 grams of cocaine base . On appeal, defendant challenged the district court's denial of his motion for a reduction of sentence. The court concluded that, because defendant was sentenced before August 3, 2010, the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA), Pub. L. No. 111-220, 124 Stat. 2372, did not affect his sentence. The court held that Amendment 750 did not apply to or help defendants who were sentenced as career offenders under U.S.S.G. 4B1.1. Because defendant was sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. 4B1.1, the retroactive amendments to the drug guidelines under U.S.S.G. 2D1.1 did not qualify him for sentence reduction. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Court Description: Criminal Law. Affirming the district court’s denial of a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the panel held that retroactive Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750 (Nov. 2011), which reduced the crack cocaine offense levels set forth in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, does not apply to or help defendants who were sentenced as career offenders pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. Consistent with this court’s prior holdings that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 does not express an intent that its ameliorative provisions apply retroactively to defendants who were sentenced before its effective date, the panel rejected the defendant’s contention that the Act itself mandates a reduction in his sentence.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.