PETER DEACON V. PANDORA MEDIA, No. 12-17734 (9th Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUL 21 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK PETER DEACON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. 12-17734 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04674-SBA Plaintiff-Appellant, ORDER* v. PANDORA MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 11, 2015 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,** District Judge. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation. On February 24, 2015, we certified a question to the Michigan Supreme Court, which it modified and answered on July 6, 2016. In view of the Court’s answer, which dispositively resolves this case, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.