KAREN GOLINSKI V. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, No. 12-15388 (9th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this Case
The court issued a subsequent related opinion or order on July 23, 2013.
Download PDF
FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAY 22 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KAREN GOLINSKI, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN BERRY, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, No. 12-15388 D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00257-JSW Northern District of California, San Francisco ORDER Defendants, and BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant Appellant. KAREN GOLINSKI, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 12-15409 D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00257-JSW Northern District of California, San Francisco UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN BERRY, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellants, and BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant. Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator. Pursuant to G.O. 5.2, the petition for initial hearing en banc was circulated to the court. A time was established by which any judge could request a vote on the petition. No judge requested a vote within the time period. Therefore, the petition for initial hearing en banc is denied. Chief Judge Kozinski and Judge Reinhardt did not participate in the consideration of this matter. The order filed April 11, 2012, remains in effect. The Clerk shall calendar these consolidated appeals for argument before a three-judge panel during the week of September 10-14, 2012, in San Francisco.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
