USA V. CARLOS BARTOLON-LOPEZ, No. 12-10449 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 04 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 12-10449 12-10450 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:11-cr-50292-DCB 4:11-cr-03821-DCB v. CARLOS BARTOLON-LOPEZ, a.k.a. Anthony Felix-Lopez, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 19, 2013** Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Carlos Bartolon-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 77-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and concurrent eight- * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bartolon-Lopez s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Bartolon-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 12-10449 & 12-10450

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.