USA V. ESTEBAN PARRA-REYES, No. 12-10139 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 23 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 12-10139 12-10144 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:03-cr-00151-PGR 2:11-cr-02516-PGR v. ESTEBAN PARRA-REYES, MEMORANDUM * Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 16, 2013 ** Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Esteban Parra-Reyes appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive sevenmonth sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S. 738 (1967), Parra-Reyes s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Parra-Reyes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Parra-Reyes has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence, and his right to challenge the revocation of supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeals. See id. at 988. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 12-10139 & 12-10144

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.