USA V. ELBIS MARTINEZ-ESCALON, No. 12-10096 (9th Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 16 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 12-10096 D.C. No. 4:11-cr-03586-CKJ v. MEMORANDUM * ELBIS SAUL MARTINEZ-ESCALON, a.k.a. Elbis Saul Martinez, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted January 15, 2013 *** Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. Elbis Saul Martinez-Escalon appeals from the district court s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry after * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez-Escalon s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Martinez-Escalon the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 12-10096

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.