JINWOO JUN V. ERIC HOLDER, JR., No. 11-73500 (9th Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED JUN 16 2014 NOT FOR PUBLICATION MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JINWOO JUN; et al., No. 11-73500 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v. A094-965-859 A094-965-858 A094-965-857 A094-865-856 ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. MEMORANDUM* On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 12, 2014** Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Jinwoo Jun and his family, natives and citizens of South Korea, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( BIA ) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge s ( IJ ) decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture ( CAT ). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review. The IJ denied petitioners claims based on an adverse credibility finding, and, alternatively, denied the adult petitioners asylum claims as time-barred and denied the remaining claims on the merits. The BIA found that petitioners did not raise any relevant challenges to the IJ s denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT. Thus, we lack jurisdiction to consider the arguments petitioners make in their opening brief. See Tall v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2008). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. 2 11-73500

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.