United States v. Catalan, No. 11-50318 (9th Cir. 2012)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed his sentence for illegal reentry. The court held that a November 1, 2012 amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines clarified, rather than altered, existing law in providing that a probation revocation sentence served after deportation should not be used to calculate the "sentence imposed" under U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(1). Therefore, the court applied the amendment retroactively and concluded that the district court erred in imposing a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) rather than a 12-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(1)(B).
Court Description: Criminal Law. Vacating a sentence for illegal reentry and remanding, the panel held that a November 1, 2012, amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines clarified, rather than altered, existing law in providing that a probation revocation sentence served after deportation should not be used to calculate the “sentence imposed” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1). The panel therefore applied the amendment retroactively and concluded that the district court erred in imposing a 16- level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) rather than a 12-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.