USA V. RANDY JANGULA, No. 11-30334 (9th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 18 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-30334 11-30335 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00048-SEH 4:03-cr-00038-SEH v. RANDY JAMES JANGULA, Defendant - Appellant. MEMORANDUM * Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 15, 2012 ** Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the consecutive 12-month sentences imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Jangula contends that his aggregate sentence is substantively unreasonable. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In light of the totality of the circumstances and the sentencing factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), the sentence is substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). AFFIRMED. 2 11-30334

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.